Summary: The plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that they were not in violation of their federal farm loan and that the liquidated damages, penalties, and future farm loan constrictions were not warranted. The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that substantial evidence supported the agency’s findings. The Court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, finding that the agency’s determination was not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.
Case Name: Arnegard, et al. v. Farm Service Agency, et al.
Case Number: 4-08-cv-83
Docket Number: 39
Date Filed: 8/19/09
Nature of Suit: 190
click here to load this opinion (PDF file)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
NORTHWESTERN DIVISION
Cameron Arnegard and Mary S. Arnegard,
Marcy Feilmeier, McKenzie County FSA; Gary J. Nelson, North Dakota State FSA; and the Farm Service Agency,
|
) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ ) MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ) AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ ) MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ) ) Case No: 4:08-cv-83 ) ) ) |