Summary:       The Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss the petition. The Court found that the Petitioner is not entitled to any relief on his petition because it is a second or successive petition over which the Court lacks jurisdiction. In the alternative, the Court found as a matter of law that the Petitioner’s petition was time-barred.

 

Case Name: Bell v. State of North Dakota

Case Number: 1-08-cv-22

Docket Number: 16

Date Filed: 7/29/08

Nature of Suit: 530

click here to load this opinion (PDF file) 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA

SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION
 

Kyle Bell,

Petitioner,

-vs-

State of North Dakota,

Respondent.

 )
) ORDER GRANTING STATE OF NORTH
) DAKOTA’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND
) DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF
) HABEAS CORPUS
)
) Case No. 1:08-cv-22
)
)
)

click here to load this opinion (PDF file)