Summary:       The defendant filed a motion to dismiss the Government’s garnishment proceeding. The Court denied the motion, finding that the garnishment was not barred by the ex post facto clause; that the commingling of civil and criminal actions is permitted to enforce a criminal restitution judgment; that the defendant has been afforded his due process rights; and that the defendant’s claim for exemptions is not a basis for dismissal.


Case Name: USA v. Larry J. Young

Case Number: 1-07-mc-09/1-90-cr-8

Docket Number: 38

Date Filed: 5/1/08 

Nature of Suit:

click here to load this opinion (PDF file)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA

SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION
 

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

-vs-

Larry J. Young,

Defendant.

 )
) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S
) MOTION TO DISMISS
)
) Case No. 1:07-MC-09/1:90-CR-08
)
)
)
)
)

click here to load this opinion (PDF file)