Summary:       The Defendant filed a motion in limine to suppress any causation testimony by the Plaintiff’s medical experts. The Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment in the event that the Court granted the motion in limine in full and excluded causation testimony. The Court granted in part and denied in part the motion in limine, finding that the Plaintiff’s treating medical physician could testify as to causation because he performed a differential diagnosis. The Court denied the motion for summary judgment as moot.


Case Name: Anderson v. Hess Corporation

Case Number: 1-07-cv-65

Docket Number: 26

Date Filed: 1/12/09

Nature of Suit: 360
click here to load this opinion (PDF file)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA

SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION
 

Karen Anderson,

Plaintiff,

-vs-

Hess Corporation, a Delaware Corporation,

Defendant.

 )
) ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
) DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S
) MOTION IN LIMINE AND DENYING
) DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
) SUMMARY JUDGMENT
)
) Case No. 1:07-cv-65
)
)

 

click here to load this opinion (PDF file)