Summary:       The Plaintiff inmates filed a motion for injunctive relief, arguing that the Defendants should be enjoined from prohibiting the Plaintiffs from communicating via United States mail for purposes of this case. The Plaintiffs also filed a motion for extension of time to file an objection to the Report and Recommendation on their Rule 60(b)(3) motion to vacate judgment. The Court granted the motion for extension of time but denied injunctive relief, finding that none of the Dataphase factors for issuance of injunctive relief was satisfied.

 

Case Name: Tweed, et al. v. Schuetzle, et al.

Case Number: 1-06-cv-32

Docket Number: 91

Date Filed: 3/23/09

Nature of Suit: 550

click here to load this opinion (PDF file) 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA

SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION
 

Reginald E. Tweed and Jonathan Moses,

Plaintiffs,

-vs-

Timothy Schuetzle, et al.,

Defendants.

 )
) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
) MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
) AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
) MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
)
) Case No. 1:06-cv-32
)
)
)

click here to load this opinion (PDF file)