Summary:       The Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, contending that their previously-served Rule 68 Offer of Judgment moots the case. The Court denied the motion, finding that the Rule 68 Offer of Judgment does not moot the case, and reserved the issues of liability and damages for the jury to resolve.


Case Name: Wilhelm v. Credico, Inc., et al.

Case Number: 1-05-cv-02

Docket Number: 128

Date Filed: 12/5/08

Nature of Suit: 480

click here to load this opinion (PDF file)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA

SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION
 

Gregory W. Wilhelm, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated, as a class,

Plaintiff,

-vs-

Credico Inc., d/b/a Credit Collections Bureau, Debbie Akovenko, and John Does 1-10,

Defendant.

 )
) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
) MOTION FOR SUMMARY
) JUDGMENT
)
) Case No. 1:05-cv-02
)
)
)
)
)

click here to load this opinion (PDF file)